Komparasi Pemikiran Yunani dan Yesus Kristus tentang Perempuan

Grace Emilia

doi:10.51615/sha.v2i1.34

Komparasi Pemikiran Yunani dan Yesus Kristus tentang Perempuan

Grace Emilia

Abstract

Abstract: This article explores the views on woman by comparing Greek-rooted thoughts prevailed upon the the Greek, Romans, and Jewish antiquities with Jesus Christ’s perspective, especially those written in the Synoptic Gospel and the Gospel of John. This study uses the multimethod research to gain a more thorough understanding about the issue. The integrative literature review is used to get insight on Greek philosophy’s perspective on woman and its influences on the thoughts existed in the Romans and Jewish antiquities. Meanwhile, the narrative-analysis method is used to gain understanding about Jesus Christ’s perspective on woman. This study concludes that the Son of God opposes various Greek-rooted thoughts on woman and shows that woman is God’s worthy creature and the heir of His promises for humanity.

Abstrak: Tulisan ini menelaah pandangan tentang perempuan melalui komparasi antara perspektif yang berakar dari pemikiran Yunani yang terdapat di tengah masyarakat Yunani, Romawi dan Yahudi kuno dengan pandangan Yesus Kristus tentang perempuan yang terdapat di Injil Sinoptik dan kitab Yohanes. Digunakan cara penelitian multi-metode dalam kajian ini untuk mendapatkan pemahaman yang lebih menyeluruh tentang isu ini. Metode studi pustaka dengan pendekatan integratif digunakan untuk menelaah perspektif terhadap perempuan dalam pemikiran Yunani kuno dan pengaruhnya pada pemikiran Romawi dan Yahudi kuno. Sementara itu, metode analisis naratif digunakan untuk melihat pandangan Yesus Kristus tentang perempuan yang terdapat di Injil Sinoptik dan kitab Yohanes. Dari penelaahan ini disimpulkan bahwa Sang Anak Allah menentang berbagai pemikiran yang berakar dari filsafat Yunani dan justru menunjukan bahwa perempuan adalah ciptaan Allah yang berharga dan merupakan pewaris janji-janji-Nya bagi umat manusia.

Keywords

Women; Greek Philosophy; Greek-Roman-Jewish Antiquities; Jesus Christ; Gospel

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aghababian, A. H. (2015). Ancient Greek Women and Warfare: Building a More Accurate Portrait of Ancient Women Through Literature. Inquiries Journal, 7(06).

Barker, K. L., & Kohlenberger III, J. R. (Eds.). (1997). Zondervan NIV Vible Commentary Volume II: New Testament. Zondervan Publishing House.

Clark, G. (1981). Roman Women. Greece & Rome, 28(02), 193–212.

Coggins, R. J. (1998). Sirach. Sheffield Academic Press.

Cook, J. (2008). Ben Sira’s Perspective on Women-Jewish and/or Hellenistic? Journal for Semitics, 17(1), 1–18.

Corley, K. E. (1993). Private Women Public Meals: Social Conflict in the Synoptic Tradition. Hendrickson Publishers.

Dupont, F. (1989). Daily Life in Ancient Rome. Blackwell Publishers.

Durant, W. (1939). The Life of Greece. Simon and Schuster.

Edwards, M. J. (2010). Early Christianity and Philosophy. In D. J. Bingham (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Early Christian Thought.

Elm, S. (2012). Sons of Hellenism, Fathers of the Church: Emperor Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus, and the Vision of Rome. University of California Press.

Feldman, M. S., Skoldberg, K., Horner, D., & Brown, R. N. (2004). Making Sense of Stories: A Rhetorical Approach to Narrative Analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 147–170.

Frost, F. J. (1971). Greek Society. D.C. Health and Company.

Glazebrook, A. (2020). Hetairai. Oxford Classical Dictionary. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.3080

Guignebert, C. (1959). The Jewish World in the Time of Jesus. University Books.

Haentjens, A. M. E. (2000). Reflections on Female Infanticide in the Greco-Roman World. L’Antiquite Classique, 69, 261–264.

Hunter, A., & Brewer, J. (2015). Designing Multimethod Research. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry (pp. 185–205). Oxford University Press.

Karamanous, M., Tsoucalas, G., Creatsas, G., & Androutsos, G. (2013). The effect of Soranus of Ephesus (98-138) on the work of midwives. Women and Birth, 26, 226–228.

Karssen, G. (2000). Ia Dinamai Perempuan Jilid 2. Yayasan Kalam Hidup.

Lyons, D. (2003). Dangerous Gifts: Ideologies of Marriage and Exchange in Ancient Greece. Classical Antiquity, 22(1), 93–134.

Malina, B. J., & Rohrbaugh, R. L. (1998). Social-Science Commentary on the Gospel of John. Fortress Press.

Mosier-Dubinsky, J. (2013). Women in Ancient Rome. JCCC Honors Journal, 4(2).

Nicolaides, A. (2016). Assessing Tertullian on the Status of Womenin the Third Century Church. Pharos Journal of Theology, 97.

Oost, S. I. (1978). Xenophon’s Attitude Toward Women. The John Hopkins University Press, 71(4).

Pape, D. R. (1976). In Search of God’s Ideal Woman. InterVarsity Press.

Richards, S. P., & Richards, L. O. (2003). Women of the Bible. Nelson Reference & Electronic.

Sacks, D. (2005). Encyclopedia of the Ancient Greek World, Revised Edition. Facts on File, Inc.

Seitkasimova, Z. A. (2019). Status of Women in Ancient Greece. Open Journal for Anthropological Studies, 3(2), 49–54.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Stagg, E. & F. (1978). Women in the World of Jesus. The Westminster Press.

Story, J. L. (2009). Female and Male in Four Annointing Stories. Priscilla Papers, 23(4), 16–23.

Swidler, L. (1976). Women in Judaism. The Scarecrow Press, Inc.

Todman, D. (2007). Childbirth in ancient Rome: From traditional folklore to obstetrics. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 47, 82–85.

Too, Y. L. (2001). Th Economies of Pedagogy: Xenophon’s Wifely Didactics. The Cambridge Classical Journal, 47(January 2001), 65–80.

Tournier, P. (1975). What’s in a Name? SCM Book Club.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51615/sha.v2i1.34